Landmark GST Judgments – A Quick Reference (2022–2025)
1. Union of India vs. Yasho Industries Ltd.
Supreme Court – May 2025
Subject:
Use of Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) for mandatory pre-deposit under Section 107(6)
📚 Key Provisions:
-
Section 107(6), CGST Act: Mandatory 10% pre-deposit for filing an appeal.
-
Section 49(4), CGST Act: Use of ITC for paying output tax only.
-
Rule 86(2), CGST Rules: Debit of ECL for discharging tax liabilities.
Section 107(6), CGST Act: Mandatory 10% pre-deposit for filing an appeal.
Section 49(4), CGST Act: Use of ITC for paying output tax only.
Rule 86(2), CGST Rules: Debit of ECL for discharging tax liabilities.
⚖️ Outcome:
The Supreme Court upheld the Gujarat High Court’s ruling, allowing the use of Input Tax Credit (ITC) via ECL (Form GST PMT-02, paid through DRC-03) for satisfying the mandatory 10% pre-deposit under Section 107(6)(b) for filing an appeal.
2. Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd. vs. Chief Commissioner of CGST
📅 Supreme Court – October 3, 2024
📝 Subject:
ITC eligibility on immovable property construction for commercial use (e.g., malls); interpretation of "plant or machinery"
📚 Key Provisions:
-
Section 17(5)(c) & (d), CGST Act: Blocked credits for works contract services & construction on own account.
-
Explanation to Section 17: Excludes buildings from "plant and machinery".
-
Section 16(4), CGST Act: Time limit for availing ITC.
Section 17(5)(c) & (d), CGST Act: Blocked credits for works contract services & construction on own account.
Explanation to Section 17: Excludes buildings from "plant and machinery".
Section 16(4), CGST Act: Time limit for availing ITC.
⚖️ Outcome:
-
Constitutional validity of Sections 17(5)(c), 17(5)(d), and 16(4) was upheld.
-
Court adopted a functionality test for "plant and machinery"—a building may qualify depending on usage.
-
Matter may be remanded for factual determination based on use-case.
Constitutional validity of Sections 17(5)(c), 17(5)(d), and 16(4) was upheld.
Court adopted a functionality test for "plant and machinery"—a building may qualify depending on usage.
Matter may be remanded for factual determination based on use-case.
3. Union of India vs. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd.
📅 Supreme Court – May 19, 2022
📝 Subject:
IGST levy on ocean freight in CIF import contracts; GST Council’s recommendations—binding or not?
📚 Key Provisions:
-
Section 5, IGST Act: Levy of IGST on inter-State supply.
-
Sections 5(3) of IGST & 9(3) of CGST: Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM).
-
Section 15, CGST Act: Transaction value and valuation.
-
Article 246A & 279A, Constitution: GST powers & Council's role.
Section 5, IGST Act: Levy of IGST on inter-State supply.
Sections 5(3) of IGST & 9(3) of CGST: Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM).
Section 15, CGST Act: Transaction value and valuation.
Article 246A & 279A, Constitution: GST powers & Council's role.
⚖️ Outcome:
-
Levy of IGST on ocean freight under RCM struck down as unconstitutional (amounts to double taxation).
-
GST Council recommendations are not binding, but carry persuasive value.
Levy of IGST on ocean freight under RCM struck down as unconstitutional (amounts to double taxation).
GST Council recommendations are not binding, but carry persuasive value.
4. Judicial Views on ITC Eligibility & Conditions
📅 Various High Courts and SC Rulings
📝 Subject:
Conditions for availing ITC, supplier default, burden of proof, retrospective cancellation
📚 Key Provisions:
-
Section 16(2), CGST Act: Conditions to avail ITC (e.g., tax payment by supplier).
-
Section 16(4), CGST Act: Deadline to claim ITC.
-
Section 155, CGST Act: Burden of proof lies on claimant.
Section 16(2), CGST Act: Conditions to avail ITC (e.g., tax payment by supplier).
Section 16(4), CGST Act: Deadline to claim ITC.
Section 155, CGST Act: Burden of proof lies on claimant.
⚖️ Outcome:
-
Courts lean towards protecting bona fide purchasers, provided conditions under Section 16(2) are fulfilled.
-
Time limit under Section 16(4) considered mandatory.
-
Supplier registration cancellation (retrospective) does not invalidate ITC if genuine purchase occurred before cancellation.
Courts lean towards protecting bona fide purchasers, provided conditions under Section 16(2) are fulfilled.
Time limit under Section 16(4) considered mandatory.
Supplier registration cancellation (retrospective) does not invalidate ITC if genuine purchase occurred before cancellation.
5. Powers of Arrest under GST – Constitutional Validity
📅 Supreme Court – Ongoing Interpretation
📝 Subject:
Legality of arrest powers granted to GST officers under CGST Act
📚 Key Provisions:
-
Section 69, CGST Act: Power to authorize arrest.
-
Section 132, CGST Act: Prescribes offences & punishments.
Section 69, CGST Act: Power to authorize arrest.
Section 132, CGST Act: Prescribes offences & punishments.
⚖️ Outcome:
-
Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of arrest powers for offences under GST, particularly serious fraud and evasion cases under Section 132.
Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of arrest powers for offences under GST, particularly serious fraud and evasion cases under Section 132.
I. Core Concepts & Levy
II. Input Tax Credit (ITC)
III. Administration & Powers
IV. Registration
V. Tax Invoice, Accounts, Records & Returns
VI. Payment of Tax
VII. Assessment & Audit
VIII. Enforcement: Inspection, Search, Seizure, Arrest
IX. Demands & Recovery
X. Appeals, Offences & Penalties